Impact of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents on mortality in patients with anemia.
نویسندگان
چکیده
OBJECTIVES Our aim was to assess the incidence of all-cause mortality in patients with anemia undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) receiving drug-eluting stents (DES) or bare-metal stents (BMS). BACKGROUND Anemia has been associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCI. However, it is unknown whether stent selection (DES or BMS) has a differential outcome in this high-risk group. METHODS Anemia was defined as a hematocrit below 36% for female subjects and below 40% for male subjects as defined by the World Health Organization. All patients undergoing PCI with DES or BMS alone from March 2003 to June 2007 were included. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. Anemia was further characterized using mean corpuscular volume as microcytic, normocytic, or macrocytic. RESULTS A total 11,181 patients underwent PCI over a 4.5-year interval; of these, 2,172 met our inclusion criteria. There were a total of 429 deaths. The majority of patients had normocytic anemia (n = 1,931). Of the 3 anemia subtypes, macrocytic anemia (DES 26%, BMS 44%) had the highest mortality followed by normocytic (DES 17%, BMS 25%) and microcytic (DES 13%, BMS 18%) anemia, respectively. All-cause mortality was significantly lower with DES in unadjusted and multivariable adjusted Cox proportional models (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.66, 95% confidence interval: 0.54 to 0.82; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In an adjusted analysis, the use of DES as compared with the use of BMS was associated with decreased mortality in patients with anemia. Additionally, among anemia subtypes, macrocytic anemia had the highest mortality.
منابع مشابه
Comprehensive meta-analysis on drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents during extended follow-up.
BACKGROUND Several observational reports have documented both increased and decreased cardiac mortality or Q-wave myocardial infarction with drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents. METHODS We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents early after intervention (<1 year) and late (>1 year) among a broad population of patients, ...
متن کاملSafety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents.
BACKGROUND The safety of drug-eluting stents has been called into question by recent reports of increased stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and death. Such studies have been inconclusive because of their insufficient size, the use of historical controls, a limited duration of follow-up, and a lack of access to original source data. METHODS We performed a pooled analysis of data from fo...
متن کاملAll-cause mortality after drug-eluting stent implantation in African-Americans.
BACKGROUND Recent studies have questioned the safety of drug-eluting stents because of a higher incidence of late stent thrombosis, raising the possibility that drug-eluting stents may be associated with an increased mortality. The effect of drug-eluting stents on mortality in African-Americans is unknown. METHODS We evaluated 628 African-American patients (354 patients treated with drug-elut...
متن کاملUse of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents after an acute coronary syndrome in Portugal: the EURHOBOP study.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The interventional cardiologist chooses a specific stent type based on the risk-benefit profile for each case. In general, drug-eluting stents should be considered in all clinical conditions, except if there are concerns or contraindications for prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy. The aim of this work was to describe the use of bare-metal vs. drug-eluting stents in ...
متن کاملLong-term safety and efficacy of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in Sweden.
BACKGROUND The long-term safety and efficacy of drug-eluting coronary stents have been questioned. METHODS We evaluated 47,967 patients in Sweden who received a coronary stent and were entered into the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry between 2003 and 2006 and for whom complete follow-up data were available for 1 to 5 years (mean, 2.7). In the primary analysis, we compare...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
دوره 2 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009